Forum: Gendered Dynamics of Academic Networks

Author:

Scalera Elliott Jamie1ORCID,Mitchell Sara McLaughlin2ORCID,Dion Michelle L3,Vargas Thomas R3,Krupnikov Yanna4,Milita Kerri5,Barry Ryan John4,Smith Victoria4,Style Hillary4,Crawford Kerry F6ORCID,Windsor Leah C7ORCID,Fattore Christina8,Breuning Marijke9,Ramos Jennifer10

Affiliation:

1. Georgia Southern University , USA

2. University of Iowa , USA

3. McMaster University , Canada

4. Stony Brook University , USA

5. Illinois State University , USA

6. James Madison University , USA

7. University of Memphis , USA

8. West Virginia University , USA

9. University of North Texas , USA

10. Loyola Marymount University , USA

Abstract

Abstract This forum examines whether scholars’ access to networks in the international studies profession is gendered and if so, the consequences of those networks for personal and professional success. Academic networks that encompass both professional and personal connections have been proposed as one solution to chilly climate issues because they provide a dual function of enhancing scholarly productivity and inclusion in the profession. The articles in the forum consider both professional (e.g., citation) and personal (e.g., mentorship, friendship) networks, as well as traditional (e.g., invited talks) and nontraditional (e.g., social media) networks. The authors show that biases that arise through the gendered nature of academic networks can be mitigated through social media, mentoring, and friendship networks. However, we must also be cognizant of other factors that create barriers for women in the profession (e.g., university prestige, parenthood, COVID-19).

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference148 articles.

1. Challenging the Gender Citation Gap: What Journals Can Do;Ainley;International Affairs Blog,2017

2. Early Indicators of Scientific Impact: Predicting Citations with Altmetrics;Akella;Journal of Informetrics,2021

3. Mentorship Behaviors and Mentorship Quality Associated with Formal Mentoring Programs: Closing the Gap between Research and Practice;Allen;Journal of Applied Psychology,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3