Author:
Berger Allen N.,Roman Raluca A.
Abstract
We investigate whether saving Wall Street through TARP really saved Main Street during the recent financial crisis. Our difference-in-difference analysis suggests that TARP statistically and economically significantly increased net job creation and net hiring establishments and decreased business and personal bankruptcies. The results are robust, including accounting for endogeneity. The main mechanisms driving the results appear to be increases in commercial real estate lending and off-balance-sheet real estate guarantees. These results suggest that saving Wall Street via TARP may have helped save Main Street, complementing the TARP literature and contributing to the cost–benefit debate.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference65 articles.
1. A "Signal-Jamming" Theory of Predation
2. The Costs of Bankruptcy: Chapter 7 Liquidation versus Chapter 11 Reorganization
3. Zanzalari, D. “Does Bank Size Matter? Investor Reactions to TARP.” Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (2016).
4. Berger, A. N. ; T. Makaew ; and R. A. Roman . “Do Business Borrowers Benefit from the TARP Program?” Working Paper, University of South Carolina (2017).
5. Paulson's gift
Cited by
74 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献