Abstract
International norms widely recognize the Indigenous right to self-determination by which Indigenous peoples define and purse their collective aspirations. Nevertheless, as progressive as legal frameworks might appear, in reality, few Indigenous communities enjoy this right and most remain vulnerable and disempowered. Activists blame Latin America's extractivist economies, while governments argue that extractive revenues are necessary to improve Indigenous life. Far from presenting a unified position, rural Indigenous peoples are most often divided over extractive industries. To assess how Indigenous self-determination has progressed, and the role that extractivism plays in this, this Element examines six Indigenous communities in Mexico, Bolivia, and Peru with contrasting experiences of extractive projects. It finds that the Indigenous ability to use favorable legislation in conjunction with available economic resources shapes different self-determination outcomes. Finally, it assesses Indigenous possibilities for self-determination in the light of environmental activism and discourses on Buen Vivir.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Reference221 articles.
1. Ambivalent multiculturalisms
2. Multicultural reforms for Mexico’s “tranquil” Indians in Yucatán
3. Político., Animal (2020). Día Internacional de los Pueblos indígenas: Por COVID se pierden líderes y conocimientos ancestrales. Available at https://cencos.com.mx/2020/08/dia-internacional-de-los-pueblos-indigenas-por-covid-se-pierden-lideres-y-conocimientos-ancestrales/ (last accessed March 22, 2023).
4. Minería, Enlace . (2014). Wild Acre Posterga Proyecto Peruano Colpayoc. Available at http://enlacemineria.blogspot.com/2014/12/wild-acre-posterga-proyecto-peruano.htm.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献