Abstract
Abstract
While many scholars and analysts have observed a decline in civility in recent years, there have been few examinations of how political, economic, and institutional structures may partially explain inter-state differences in these trends. We suggest three potential explanations: (1) institutional structures, such as legislative professionalism and gubernatorial power, have created different contexts in which legislators build and maintain inter-personal relationships; (2) partisan competition has led to less bipartisan cooperation and contributed to strained relationships between members of different parties; and, (3) economic inequity and change has contributed to economic anxiety among citizens, contributing to conflict in legislative bodies as elected officials attempt to navigate emerging policy challenges. To test these explanations, we develop an innovative measure of civility using a national survey of lobbyists and a partial Multilevel Regression and Poststratification (MRP) design. Findings suggest that there is some validity to all three explanations, and signifying that civility is at least partially a result of structural issues.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Reference65 articles.
1. “I Disrespectfully Agree”: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization
2. Political Conservatism, Need for Cognitive Closure, and Intergroup Hostility
3. Shorman, J. 2020. “Kansas Lawmakers Sign Up For ‘Civility Summit’ in Hopes of Shrinking Political Divide.” Wichita Eagle, January 15. Retrieved from https://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article239314838.html
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献