Author:
Hoy M Katherine,Goldman Joseph D,Sebastian Rhonda S
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveEstimates of fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption vary depending on intake definition, which may be determined by research purpose. Researchers have used two methods to evaluate intake: epidemiological and behavioural. The present study describes FV intake by adults using epidemiological v. behavioural approaches.DesignOne-day dietary intake data from What We Eat In America, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009–2012 were used. Sample weights were used to produce nationally representative estimates. FV intake (in cup-equivalents (CE)) was estimated using the Food Patterns Equivalents Database. The epidemiological method considered all FV after disaggregating foods and beverages. The behavioural method included foods that provided at least 0·2 CE FV per 100 g, and excluded sources high in fat, added sugar and Na.SettingNationally representative survey of the US population.SubjectsAdults (n 10 563) aged ≥20 years.ResultsFor epidemiological v. behavioural, fruit intake was 1·1 v. 1·0 CE for males and 1·0 v. 0·9 CE for females. Vegetable intake was 1·8 v. 1·1 CE for males and 1·5 v. 1·0 CE for females.ConclusionsThe definition of FV intake affects estimates of consumption by the population and is an important consideration when planning and comparing research studies. The method used should align with research goals to assure accurate interpretation and validity of results.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference19 articles.
1. Evaluating Brief Measures of Fruit and Vegetable Consumption Frequency and Variety
2. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (2012) USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies, 5.0 – Documentation and User Guide. Beltsville, MD: Food Surveys Research Group; available at http://www.ars.usda.gov/SP2UserFiles/Place/80400530/pdf/fndds/fndds5_doc.pdf
3. The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes;Moshfegh;Am J Clin Nutr,2008
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献