Author:
Dalby J. A.,Forbes J. M.,Varley M. A.,Jagger S.
Abstract
AbstractThe requirement for a training period prior to a choice feeding regime was assessed using 36 weaned piglets whose initial live weight was 6·2 (s.d. 1·21) kg. Two foods (H and L) were offeredad libitumas the choice and these were similar in energy but differed in crude protein (CP) concentration (291 g/kg and 155 g/kg fresh matter respectively). The pigs ivere subjected to one of three training treatments: treatment ALTERNATE allowed piglets the two foods separately on alternate days for 6 days, followed by a free choice of the two foods; treatment THREE allowed 3 days of one food followed by 3 days of the other prior to the free choice; treatment CHOICE gave the animals free choice immediately. Piglets on a fourth treatment, CONTROL, were given a single food M (242 g CP per kg fresh food) as a control. Weight gain (0·60, 0·59, 0·59 and 0·61 (s.e. 0·005) kg/day) and food intake (0·776, 0·752, 0·771 and 0·747 (s.e. 0·010) kg/day) did not differ significantly between treatments ALTERNATE, THREE, CHOICE and CONTROL respectively in the 19-day post-training period. A significant difference was seen in the protein consumption (0·145, 0·150, 0·139 and 0·177 (s.e. 0·005) kg/day). This together with a tendency for the proportion of food H selected to decline as the growth period progressed, indicated that newly weaned piglets are capable of regulating their protein intake when offered a free choice of two foods differing in their CP concentration, without a necessity for an initial training period.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology
Reference23 articles.
1. The ability of pigs to control their protein intake when fed in three different ways
2. Diet selection in pigs: choices made by growing pigs given foods of different protein concentrations
3. Cumming R. B. and Mastika I. M. 1987. Why choice feeding trials have failed. Proceedings of the Poultry Husbandry Research Foundation symposium, University of Sydney, pp. 23–29.
4. Close W. H. 1987. The influence of the thermal environment on the productivity of pigs. In Pig housing and the environment (ed. Smith A. T. and Lawrence T. L. J. ), occasional publication, British Society of Animal Production, no. 11, pp. 9–24.
5. Behavioural factors modifying acceptance of supplementary foods by sheep;Chappie;Research and Development in Agriculture,1986
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献