Abstract
AbstractAlthough the United States has relied on the ICJ's doctrine of specially-affected states to claim that it and other powerful states in the Global North play a privileged role in the formation of customary international law, the doctrine itself has never been systematically developed by the ICJ or by legal scholars. This article fills that lacuna by addressing two questions: (1) what makes a state “specially affected”?; and (2) what is the importance of a state qualifying as “specially affected” for the formation of custom? It concludes that a theoretically coherent understanding of the doctrine would give states in the Global South significant power over custom formation.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference69 articles.
1. The Theory of International Customary Law;Danilenko;German Y.B. Int'l L.,1988
2. Revisiting State Succession to Humanitarian Treaties: Is There a Case for Automaticity?
3. Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation
4. Sovereignty over Submarine Areas;Lauterpacht;Brit. Y.B. Int'l L.,1950
5. Some Remarks on the Persistent Objector Rule in Customary International Law;Elias;Denning L.J.,1991
Cited by
51 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献