Author:
Zombade S. S.,Lodhi G. N.,Ichhponani J. S.
Abstract
SummaryBody-weight gain, protein efficiency ratio (PER), standardized protein efficiency ratio (Std PER) and gross protein value (GPV, GPV1and GPV2) bioassays were compared with nitrogen incorporation efficiency (NTE) for their accuracy and precision to determine protein quality of fish meal (FM), groundnut cake (GN), mustard cake (MS) and cottonseed cake (CS) for poultry. Results showed that all the bioassays were significantly (P < 0·05) correlated with NIE and were equally effective in ranking the samples of FM, GN, MS and CS according to their protein quality although body-weight gain procedure was less sensitive.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Genetics,Agronomy and Crop Science,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference19 articles.
1. A method of expressing numerically the growth promoting value of proteins;Osborne;Journal of Biological Chemistry,1919
2. The Relation of the Amino Acid-Sugar Reaction to The Nutritive Value of Protein Hydrolysates
3. A New Method for Calculating the Gross Value of Proteins
4. The Determination of the Net Utilization of Proteins by a Shortened Method
5. Gross value of protein supplements for poultry;Robertson;Washington Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin,1940
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献