Effects of fish-meal supplementation and shearing in store/finishing systems for lambs

Abstract

AbstractDevelopment of new systems of lamb finishing for the late winter/spring market involving an extended housed store period on a predominantly straw diet are constrained by unacceptable reduction in muscle mass arising from inadequate protein supply during dietary adaptation from grass to straw. Problems with subsequent finishing on forage brassicas fedin situ arise from carcass contamination due to soiled wool of crossbred lambs which grow long fleeces over the extended store I finishing period. In order to study the effect of fish-meal supplementation on dietary change over from grass to straw 116 Mule wether lambs were allocated to four treatments, three of which received a supplement of 100 glday fish meal for 28 days from housing and introduction of a diet of straw ad libitum and 225 glday grain distillers' dark grains, the fourth group received no fish meal and was unshorn (No F/US). Shearing treatments of shorn (F/S), unshorn (F/US) and crutched (F/C) were applied to fish-meal supplemented group's. After 112 days, the housed lambs were grazed outside on swedes (Brassica napus) and effects of treatments on performance and bacterial contamination of carcasses (shearing treatments only) were studied. Fish-meal supplementation significantly reduced weight loss on dietary change by 2·2 kg after 45 days (P< 0·001). Of fishmeal supplemented lambs 83% eventually ‘finished’ (defined as Meat and Livestock Commission fat class 3LI3H) v. 34% of unsupplemented lambs. Shearing or crutching had little effect on store or finishing performance indicating adequate fleece regrowth for insulation purposes after turn-out. Shorn and crutched lambs had lower levels of bacterial carcass contamination with reductions of 0·06, 0·42 and 0·40 in counts for colony forming units per cm2, coliforms and Escherichia coli on leg sites (P < 0·05). Economic evaluation indicated financial advantage from fish-meal supplementation with an increase in margin over food costs of €3·50 as a result of heavier carcass weight and a reduced need for remedial concentrate feeding in the store period.