Abstract
This article draws attention to an aspect that thus far has escaped systematic scrutiny in the theoretical literature on the political legitimacy of global governance – functions. It does so by exploring the idea that the content and justification of a principle of political legitimacy for global governance may depend on the function of the entity it is supposed to regulate (for example, law making, policy making, implementation, monitoring). Two arguments are made: one meta-theoretical and one substantive. The meta-theoretical argument demonstrates the fruitfulness of adopting a ‘function-sensitive approach’ to political legitimacy to address this aspect. The substantive argument develops the contours of an account of political legitimacy by applying this approach. This account consists of five regulative principles, which are sensitive to, and vary in accordance with, different functions in global politics.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Legitimacy without Public Justification;An Instrumentalist Theory of Political Legitimacy;2024-05-16
2. Rights, Consent, and Legitimacy;An Instrumentalist Theory of Political Legitimacy;2024-05-16
3. Indirect Instrumentalism;An Instrumentalist Theory of Political Legitimacy;2024-05-16
4. Formulating Instrumentalism;An Instrumentalist Theory of Political Legitimacy;2024-05-16
5. The Importance of Justice;An Instrumentalist Theory of Political Legitimacy;2024-05-16