Indirect Instrumentalism

Author:

Brinkmann Matthias1

Affiliation:

1. LMU Munich , München, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Instrumentalism claims that political legitimacy should be distributed in such a way that justice is promoted best. Building on a distinction made by consequentialists in moral philosophy, this chapter argues that instrumentalists should distinguish two levels of normative thinking about legitimacy, the critical (or foundational) and the applied (or practical) level. The crucial insight is that the content of the moral and political principles on the critical level can diverge from the content of the practical standards that should guide us in moral and political life. An indirect instrumentalism which acknowledges this distinction has significant advantages over structurally simpler forms of instrumentalism that do not; in particular, such an instrumentalism can answer various counter-examples that have been brought against the position. The chapter also answers various objections against indirect instrumentalism, for example, that it is impracticable or repugnant.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3