Abstract
AbstractAdaptation has the attributes of a private good that aims to protect a country from climate change, while mitigation, which contributes to the reduction of worldwide greenhouse gas emissions, has the properties of a public good. This paper attempts to investigate how the innovation of adaptation technology by a developed country (the North) may affect a developing country (the South) as well as the North through changes of mitigation in both countries. We show that the efficacy of adaptation determines the level of both countries' mitigation, and thereby causes them to be better or worse off. For both countries to be better off, it is required that the innovation be neither very effective nor very ineffective. Furthermore, we demonstrate that by introducing an international transfer system in which the North is taxed according to the level of adaptation, both countries can be better off even if the innovation is highly effective.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,General Environmental Science,Development
Reference26 articles.
1. Ingham A. , Ma J. , and Ulph A. (2005), ‘Can adaptation and mitigation be complements?’, Working Paper No. 79, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Norwich.
2. GLOBAL WARMING, IRREVERSIBILITY AND LEARNING*
3. To mitigate or to adapt: How to confront global climate change
4. Lecocq F. and Shalizi Z. (2007), ‘Balancing expenditures on mitigation of and adaptation to climate change: an exploration of issues relevant to developing countries’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4299, World Bank, Washington, DC.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献