Author:
Lazkano Itziar,Marrouch Walid,Nkuiya Bruno
Abstract
AbstractAdaptation costs to climate change vary widely across countries, especially between developed and developing countries. Adaptation costs also influence a country's decision to abate and join international environmental agreements (IEAs). In this paper, the authors study how these cost differences affect participation incentives. Their model identifies two channels through which adaptation affects free-riding incentives: carbon leakage and cost asymmetry in adaptation. In contrast with the common view, the authors find that the presence of adaptation is not necessarily an impediment to cooperation on abatement. They also present conditions under which adaptation can strengthen or weaken free-riding incentives. The results serve as a cautionary tale to policy makers and suggest that policies directed at reducing carbon leakage and/or cost differences between developed and developing countries may also affect the success and failure of IEAs.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,General Environmental Science,Development
Reference33 articles.
1. Buob S. and G. Stephan (2008), ‘Global climate change and the funding of adaptation’, Discussion Paper No. 08-04, Universität Bern, Switzerland.
2. International Environmental Agreements under Endogenous Uncertainty
3. Greenhouse gas emission, mitigation and innovation of adaptation technology in a North–South economy
4. Faiola A. and J. Eilperin (2009), ‘Dutch defense against climate disaster: adapt to the change’, The Washington Post, 6 December.
5. International environmental agreements among asymmetric nations
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献