Why not believe in an evil God? Pragmatic encroachment and some implications for philosophy of religion

Author:

SCRUTTON ANASTASIA PHILIPPA

Abstract

AbstractPointing to broad symmetries between the idea that God is omniscient, omnipotent, and all-good, and the idea that God is omniscient, omnipotent, but all-evil, the evil-God challenge raises the question of why theists should prefer one over the other. I respond to this challenge by drawing on a recent theory in epistemology, pragmatic encroachment, which asserts that practical considerations can alter the epistemic status of beliefs. I then explore some of the implications of my argument for how we do philosophy of religion, arguing that practical and contextual as well as alethic considerations are properly central to the discipline.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Philosophy,Religious studies

Reference31 articles.

1. Knowledge and Action

2. Developing positive relationships with voices: A preliminary Grounded Theory

3. God, the demon, and the status of theodicies;Stein;American Philosophical Quarterly,1990

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Encountering Evil: The Evil-god Challenge from Religious Experience;European Journal for Philosophy of Religion;2020-09-24

2. Evilism and the a priori;Religious Studies;2020-03-11

3. Moral motivation and the evil-god challenge;Religious Studies;2020-02-03

4. A Thomistic Answer to the Evil‐God Challenge;The Heythrop Journal;2019-02-07

5. Truth, consequences, and the Evil-god challenge: a response to Anastasia Scrutton;Religious Studies;2018-10-16

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3