A Conservative Right to Privacy: Legal, Ideological, and Coalitional Transformations in US Social Conservatism

Author:

Wuest JoannaORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe right to privacy has long been regarded as a liberal progressive principle, one that guarantees gender-based equality and liberty in the domain of reproductive rights. Since the US Supreme Court’s renowned articulation of privacy in Roe v. Wade, privacy’s opponents have condemned the right as an illegitimate judicial invention with no basis in the Constitution. This article addresses the puzzle of why a coalition of Christian conservative legal organizations, conservative foundations, Trump administration officials, Republican party lawmakers, and trans-exclusionary radical feminists has assembled to redefine the right to privacy in service of anti-transgender politics. While much attention has been paid to the proliferation of religious liberty-based challenges to the rights of sexual and gender minorities, these accounts miss how central the fight to reassociate privacy has become in conflicts waged in state and federal courts, city and state legislatures, and ballot referendum campaigns. Although this coalition eschews any mention of Roe or reproductive rights, it does adopt a substantive due process-based interpretation of privacy’s mandate despite the typical conservative disdain for that doctrine. Additionally, the coalition frames its project as one that balances competing rights claims by defending (cis) women’s rights against allegedly lopsided trans-inclusive reforms.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Law,General Social Sciences

Reference130 articles.

1. Smith, Gwendolyn Ann. 2013. “Transmissions: Of Petitioners, Privacy, and ‘Pacific Justice.’” Bay Area Reporter, December 11. https://www.ebar.com/news///244103.

2. Law and American Political Development

3. The Right to Privacy

4. Law and American Political Development

5. Heritage Foundation. n.d. “Biology Isn’t Bigotry: Why Sex Matters in the Age of Gender Identity.” https://www.heritage.org/marriage-and-family/event/biology-isnt-bigotry-why-sex-matters-the-age-gender-identity.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Assuaging the Anxious Matriarch;Feminism against Cisness;2024-03-29

2. Queer Collegiate Student Athletes;Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development;2024-02-16

3. Agents of scientific uncertainty: Conflicts over evidence and expertise in gender- affirming care bans for minors;Social Science & Medicine;2023-12

4. Protecting women’s sports? Anti-trans youth sports bills and white supremacy;Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies;2023-10-02

5. Overcoming Public Health “Surveillance”: When Words Matter;American Journal of Public Health;2023-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3