Scoping article: research frontiers on the governance of the Sustainable Development Goals

Author:

Hickmann ThomasORCID,Biermann FrankORCID,Sénit Carole-AnneORCID,Sun YixianORCID,Bexell Magdalena,Bolton Mitzi,Bornemann Basil,Censoro Jecel,Charles Aurelie,Coy Dominique,Dahlmann Frederik,Elder Mark,Fritzsche Felicitas,Gehre Galvão ThiagoORCID,Grainger-Brown Jarrod,Inoue Cristina,Jönsson Kristina,Koloffon Rosas Montserrat,Krellenberg KerstinORCID,Moallemi EnayatORCID,Lobos Alva Ivonne,Malekpour Shirin,Ningrum Dianty,Paneva Aneliya,Partzsch Lena,Ramiro RodrigoORCID,Raven RobORCID,Szedlacsek Eszter,Thompson John,van Driel MelanieORCID,Viani Damasceno Jéssica,Webb Robert,Weiland Sabine

Abstract

Abstract Non-Technical Summary This article takes stock of the 2030 Agenda and focuses on five governance areas. In a nutshell, we see a quite patchy and often primarily symbolic uptake of the global goals. Although some studies highlight individual success stories of actors and institutions to implement the goals, it remains unclear how such cases can be upscaled and develop a broader political impact to accelerate the global endeavor to achieve sustainable development. We hence raise concerns about the overall effectiveness of governance by goal-setting and raise the question of how we can make this mode of governance more effective. Technical Summary A recent meta-analysis on the political impact of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) has shown that these global goals are moving political processes forward only incrementally, with much variation across countries, sectors, and governance levels. Consequently, the realization of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development remains uncertain. Against this backdrop, this article explores where and how incremental political changes are taking place due to the SDGs, and under what conditions these developments can bolster sustainability transformations up to 2030 and beyond. Our scoping review builds upon an online expert survey directed at the scholarly community of the ‘Earth System Governance Project’ and structured dialogues within the ‘Taskforce on the SDGs’ under this project. We identified five governance areas where some effects of the SDGs have been observable: (1) global governance, (2) national policy integration, (3) subnational initiatives, (4) private governance, and (5) education and learning for sustainable development. This article delves deeper into these governance areas and draws lessons to guide empirical research on the promises and pitfalls of accelerating SDG implementation. Social Media Summary As SDG implementation lags behind, this article explores 5 governance areas asking how to strengthen the global goals.

Funder

European Research Council

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3