Governing Europe's Recovery and Resilience Facility: Between Discipline and Discretion

Author:

Bokhorst DavidORCID,Corti FrancescoORCID

Abstract

Abstract The EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) represents a bold integrationist step in European economic governance. Besides the size of the fiscal envelope, the novelty also lies in the new governance. Member states prepare integrated investment and reform plans and need to fulfil milestones and targets to access funding. This article assesses the balance of power in negotiating the plans and the effect on domestic policymaking. Based on five case studies, we show that the RRF has enhanced the steering capacity of the European Commission on reforms and investments, while member states remain ultimately in charge of the plans. Second, we argue that, while the RRF enhances the efficiency of the policymaking process and allows the fast-forwarding of reforms, it has also led to a contractualization of the relationship with the EU and a centralization of decision-making processes within member states. This latter aspect may hamper ownership and legitimacy in policy implementation.

Funder

H2020 European Research Council

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference38 articles.

1. Ferrera, M (2016) Governing at a Distance: Democratic Responsibility and Social Solidarity in the Eurozone. Verfassungsblog on Matters Constitutional, 22 November, https://verfassungsblog.de/governing-at-a-distance-democratic-responsibility-and-social-solidarity-in-the-eurozone/.

2. Rubio, E (2022) From Words to Action: Analysing Possible Scenarios and Political Dynamics in the Process of Disbursing the European Recovery and Resilience Facility Funds, Policy Paper, No. 274, Jacques Delors Institute, February, https://institutdelors.eu/en/publications/from-words-to-action/.

3. An Introduction: “Macroeconomic Policy Coordination and Domestic Politics: Policy Coordination in the EU from the European Semester to the Covid‐19 Crisis”*

4. Learning from Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the EU

5. Schelkle, W , Miró, J and Natili, M (2022) Money Makes the World Go Round: How Much Difference Do Recovery and Resilience Plans Make to Fiscal and Social Governance. Paper presented at ECPR-SGEU Conference 8–10 June 2022, Luiss University, Rome.

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3