Abstract
AbstractStates have a significant influence on the selection of judges to international courts. This raises the concern that judges will be biased in favor of their home states, a concern backed by some empirical research. To counter that danger, international courts usually sit in large and diverse panels. Scholars have argued that this gives judges only rare occasions to tip the balance in favor of their home states. The problem begins, however, when judges start forming coalitions among themselves, giving judges with national biases a practical possibility to change the result of cases. To assess the magnitude of this threat to judicial independence, the paper draws on decades of scholarship in the field of judicial behavior. By understanding how judges behave, scholars can come closer to deciphering the true impact of judicial selection to international courts on international judgments.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference79 articles.
1. 1. See e.g Kosa?? David, Selecting Strasburg Judges: A Critique, in Selecting Europe's Judges: A Critical Review of the Appointment Procedures to the European Courts 120 (Michal Bobek ed., 2015)
2. Judicial Tactics in the European Court of Human Rights;Dothan;Chi. J. Int'l. L.,2011
3. Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response to Professors Posner and Yoo;Helfer;Cal. L. Rev.,2005
4. Judicial Independence in International Tribunals;Posner;Cal. L. Rev.,2005
5. Reneging on History? Playing the Court/Congress/President Civil Rights Game;Eskridge;Cal. L. Rev.,1991
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献