Abstract
Courts around the globe have become central players in governance, those in Southeast Asia have been no exception. This Element analyses the historical foundations, patterns, and drivers of judicialization of politics by mapping critical junctures that have shaped the emergence of modern courts in the region and providing a basic typology of courts and politics that extends the analysis to the contemporary situation. It also offers a new relational theory that helps explain the dynamics of judicial recruitment, decision-making, court performance-and ultimately perceptions of judicial legitimacy. In a region where power is often concentrated among oligarchs and clientelist political dynamics persist, it posits that courts are best comprehended as institutional hybrids. These hybrids seamlessly blend formal and informal practices, with profound implications for how Southeast Asian courts are molding both the rule of law and political governance.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Reference246 articles.
1. The limits to Judicial Independence: Cambodia’s Political Culture and the Civil Law;West;Democratization,2019
2. Thailand’s Deep State, Royal Power and the Constitutional Court (1997–2015);Mérieau;Journal of Contemporary Asia,2016
3. Politics and the Federal Court of Malaysia, 1960–2018: An Empirical Investigation;Dressel;Asian Journal of Law and Society,2022
4. Judicial Globalization.;Anne;Virginia Journal of International Law,2000
5. Judicial Review – From Angst to Empathy;Keong;Singapore Academy of Law Journal,2010
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献