Selecting Judges in Poland and Germany: Challenges to the Rule of law in Europe and Propositions for a new Approach to Judicial Legitimacy

Author:

Sanders Anne,von Danwitz Luc

Abstract

The recent reforms of the Polish Judiciary have sparked a lively debate in Europe on the importance of judicial independence. This Article deals with the new Polish system of selecting and appointing judges and critically assesses it in the light of European standards for judicial appointments. It then compares the new Polish system to the German system of selecting judges, which has been advanced as a point of reference for the reform by the Polish government. Finally, the Article reconsiders and challenges some of the established concepts of German constitutional law as to the selection of judges and judicial legitimacy.The Article was closed on September 2, 2017 and accepted for publication. Subsequent developments could be included until March 15, 2018. The authors would like to thank Judge Thomas Guddat and theDeutsch-Polnische Richtervereinigung(Association of German and Polish Judges) for providing valuable details on the reforms in Poland.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Law

Reference265 articles.

1. See Huster & Rux, supra note 157, at paras. 61, 64; Gerd Reinschmidt, Zur Legitimationsfrage bei der Richterwahl (The question of legitimacy in the judicial election), Zeitschrift Fur Rechtspolitik [ZRP] 160, 161 (1972);

2. Helmut K J Ridder, Empfiehlt es sich, die vollst??ndige Selbstverwaltung aller gerichte im Rahmen des Grundgesetzes gesetzlich einzuf??hren? (Is it advisable to introduce the complete self-administration of all courts in the framework of the Basic Law?) Gutachten zum 40TH DJT, Vol. I, 91, 125 (1953).

3. See id., art. 1 (14).

4. See Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfGE] [Federal Constitutional Court] supra 158, para. 158.

5. See Commission Venice , CDL-STD 020, para. 21 (1997).

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3