In the Name of Comparative Constitutional Jurisprudence: The Consideration of German Precedents by South African Constitutional Court Judges

Author:

Rautenbach Christa,du Plessis Lourens

Abstract

Judges involved in constitutional adjudication often engage in comparative analyses of foreign cases. The judges of South Africa's Constitutional Court [hereinafter Constitutional Court] do so, too. The phenomenon has been given many names such as “transjudicialism,” “transjudicial communication,” “constitutionalist dialogue,” “judicial globalization,” “constitutional cross-fertilization,” “transnational contextualization,” “globalization of judgment,” “globalization of national courts,” “constitutional borrowing,” “constitutional comparativism,” and “judicial comparativism.” All these terms have merit, especially within their appropriate context, but for the purposes of this contribution we will use the term “comparative constitutional jurisprudence” to name the phenomenon we wish to describe and discuss. First, in the South African context, the terms “dialogue,” “cross-fertilization,” and “globalization” do not reflect the true nature of the exercises in drawing comparisons in the South African Constitutional Court. These terms imply a reciprocal dialogue between two or more courts from different jurisdictions. It is evident, however, that the South African Constitutional Court has been considering far more foreign jurisprudence than any non-South African constitutional court has been considering South African jurisprudence—in other words, this has largely been a case of one-way traffic. S v. Makwanyane, in many ways the inaugural decision of the Constitutional Court, contains 220 foreign case citations from 11 countries and three supranational courts. To our knowledge no other foreign court can boast a comparable statistic.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Law

Reference193 articles.

1. Kentridge , supra note 152, at 9–10.

2. Ackermann Joachim Wieland, Art 14 GG, in Grundgesetz Kommentar (Horst Dreier ed., 1996) (cited in First National Bank of SA Ltd t/a Wesbank v. Commissioner, SARS; First National Bank of SA Ltd t/a Wesbank v. Minister of Finance 2002 4 SA 768 (CC) paras. 89, 90, n.137, 138 (S. Afr.)).

3. Michalowski Sabine & Woods Lorna , German Constitutional Law (1999) (cited in First National Bank of SA Ltd t/a Wesbank v. Commissioner, SARS

4. First National Bank of SA Ltd t/a Wesbank v. Minister of Finance 2002 4 SA 768 (CC) para. 88, n.136 (S. Afr.)).

5. Gerhard Robbers, Einführung In Das Deutsche Recht (1994) (cited in Bernstein v. Bester 1996 2 SA 751 (CC) para. 78, n.130 (S. Afr.)).

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Independence and Accountability of the South African Judiciary;European Yearbook of Constitutional Law 2019;2019-12-03

2. Comparative Methodologies;The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law;2019-10-03

3. In Search of an Identity: Voluntary Foreign Citations in Discordant Constitutional Settings;American Journal of Comparative Law;2014-07-01

4. Free Movement of Legal Sources: The Use of Foreign Sources in Private Law in Europe;Studies in European Economic Law and Regulation;2014

5. Cautious But Engaged—An Empirical Study of the Australian High Court's Use of Foreign and International Materials in Constitutional Cases;International Journal of Legal Information;2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3