Author:
Flach Laura,Kühl Sarah,Lambertz Christian,DeMonte Erica,Gauly Matthias
Abstract
AbstractWe investigated and compared the effects of low and high concentrate supplementation in terms of animal welfare, health and reproductive performance in two different dairy cow breeds on small-scale mountain farms. 64 South Tyrolean dairy farms were evaluated using an on-farm assessment for animal-based and resource-based welfare indicators, data from test day records, and a questionnaire for the farmer. Farms were divided into four groups: low input Tyrolean Grey (L-TG), low input Brown Swiss (L-BS), high input Tyrolean Grey (H-TG) and high input Brown Swiss (H-BS). Effects of intensity level, breed and their interaction were calculated and analyzed statistically. The predominant husbandry system across all groups was tie-stall. The average energy-corrected milk yield increased with increasing concentrate level, with L-TG showing the lowest and H-BS showing the highest milk yield. Age at first calving was lowest in H-BS when compared to all other systems, while numbers of lactations were higher in L-TG compared to H-BS. Feed efficiency (percentage of milk out of roughage) was significantly higher in L-TG and L-BS when compared to H-TG and H-BS. L-BS showed the poorest results for most of the welfare indicators such as lean cows, lesions and percentage of dirty animals. In conclusion, a higher concentrate level in diets does not lead automatically to lower animal welfare for dairy cows in alpine regions. Indeed, keeping high yielding breeds in extensive systems seems to be challenging. The dual-purpose breed TG showed some clear advantages in that calving interval was lower and the number of lactations greater.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology,General Medicine,Food Science
Reference56 articles.
1. Autonome Provinz Bozen-Südtirol (2017) Agrar-und Forstbericht 2017 [Agricultural and Forestry Report 2017]. Athesia
2. The influence of concentrate amount on locomotion and clinical lameness in dairy cattle;Manson;Animal Science,1988
3. Farm Animal Welfare Council (1979) Five Freedoms. First Press Notice., 5/12MAFF.69–478.
4. MacDonald, JM , McBride, WD , O'Donoghue, E , Nehring, RF , Sandretto, C and Mosheim, R 2007 Profits, costs, and the changing structure of dairy farming. USDA-ERS Economic Research Report 47.
5. Grundfutterleistung einheitlich berechnen [Calculate roughage performance uniformly];Weiß;Milchpraxis,2001
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献