Abstract
Abstract:Objectives:Performing ‘good work’ in either neurosurgery or neuroscience alone is a challenge. Despite this, a large number of neurosurgeons divide their careers between the two fields, and attempt to excel in both arenas simultaneously. The purpose of this study is to explore perceptions on whether it is possible to do good work in both neurosurgery and research simultaneously, or whether one field suffers at the expense of the other.Methods:This question was put to practicing neurosurgeons via an electronic survey that was distributed to resident and staff neurosurgeons in Canada.Results:54 surgeons completed the survey, 32 of whom were current or intended neurosurgeon-scientists. Themes explored through the survey included motives behind the pursuit or absence of research in one's neurosurgical career, the quality and feasibility of a dual career, and alternatives to one individual assuming a dual role.Conclusions:The opinions obtained revealed that it is possible to do good work in both neurosurgery and neuroscience simultaneously, but in reality it is very difficult to do. Alternatives to this dual career, such as collaboration between clinical neurosurgeons and pure scientists for example, may help bridge the gap between clinical and research arenas.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Clinical Neurology,Neurology,General Medicine
Reference27 articles.
1. Defining medical professionalism: a qualitative study
2. Challenges in Contemporary Academic Neurosurgery
3. “What makes a good doctor?” A cross sectional survey of public opinion;Leahy;Ir Med J,2003
4. Key Factors Contributing to the Success of Clinician Investigators
5. The neurosurgeon as clinician-scientist: the fundamentals;Vates;Clin Neurosurg,2004
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献