Abstract
In early epidemiological studies of diet and cancer the stress was on the search for causal factors. Population (ecological) studies tended to show a strong correlation between meat intake, particularly red meat, and the risk of colo-rectal cancer. They also tended to show meat to be strongly inversely correlated with cancers of the stomach and oesophagus and liver. Early case- control studies tended to support the postulated role for red meat in colo-rectal carcinogenesis, although more recent case-control studies, particularly those from Europe, have tended to show no relationship. The cohort studies in general failed to detect any relationship between meat intake and colo-rectal cancer risk. The available evidence points to the intake of protective factors such as vegetables and whole-grain cereals being the main determinants of colo-rectal cancer risk, with meat intake only coincidentally related.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference25 articles.
1. Food groups and risk of colorectal cancer in Italy
2. Chemoprevention of metachronous adenomas of the large bowel: design and interim results of a randomised trial of calcium and fibre;Faivre;European Journal of Cancer Prevention,1997
3. Cancer incidence and mortality in Europe, 1983–87
4. A prospective cohort study on the relation between meat consumption and the risk of colon cancer;Goldbohm;Cancer Research,1994
5. Colorectal cancer and the intake of nutrients: Oligosaccharides are a risk factor, fats are not. A case‐control study in Belgium
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献