Author:
Kelly-Pumarol Issis J.,Henderson Perrin Q.,Rushing Julia T.,Andrews Joseph E.,Kost Rhonda G.,Wagenknecht Lynne E.
Abstract
IntroductionThe patient portal may be an effective method for administering surveys regarding participant research experiences but has not been systematically studied.MethodsWe evaluated 4 methods of delivering a research participant perception survey: mailing, phone, email, and patient portal. Participants of research studies were identified (n=4013) and 800 were randomly selected to receive a survey, 200 for each method. Outcomes included response rate, survey completeness, and cost.ResultsAmong those aged <65 years, response rates did not differ between mail, phone, and patient portal (22%, 29%, 30%,p>0.07). Among these methods, the patient portal was the lowest-cost option. Response rates were significantly lower using email (10%,p<0.01), the lowest-cost option. In contrast, among those aged 65+ years, mail was superior to the electronic methods (p<0.02).ConclusionsThe patient portal was among the most effective ways to reach research participants, and was less expensive than surveys administered by mail or telephone.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference12 articles.
1. Ryan C , Lewis JM . Computer and internet use in the United States: 2015. American Community Survey Reports, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC, 2017.
2. Patient portals and personal health information online: perception, access, and use by US adults;Peacock;Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association,2017
3. Development of a Research Participants’ Perception Survey to Improve Clinical Research
4. Effects of Survey Mode, Patient Mix, and Nonresponse on CAHPS®Hospital Survey Scores
5. Research Participant-Centered Outcomes at NIH-Supported Clinical Research Centers
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献