Abstract
SynopsisProcess of care is the most immediate, relevant and susceptible to improvement of Donabedian's three elements of quality assurance. To place the study of process in context, the history of quality assurance in English-speaking countries is reviewed, with particular emphasis on the U.S.A. A range of methods are examined in detail and examples are provided to illustrate their strengths and weaknesses. Particular attention is paid to the use of explicit and implicit criteria. The importance of information technology in monitoring the process of care cannot be over-stated. Limited audit is possible with manual records but all substantial projects require computer support. The value of capturing data from operational systems rather than from dedicated projects is emphasised. Attention is drawn to the key importance of structured records and minimum data sets; these allow information to be pooled and process studies to be generalised. Examples are given of quality assurance projects which have used information technology. Finally potential future developments are reviewed with particular reference to clinical guidelines and computer-based clinical decision support systems.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference122 articles.
1. Defining essential data for audit in general practice.
2. Quality Assurance Programme in a Community Dental Service
3. Doctoring the system;Richards;The British Journal of Health Care Computing,1991
4. Retrospective review of hospital patient records.
5. Computer-assisted shared care: the Aberdeen Blood Pressure Clinic;Petrie;Journal of Hypertension,1989
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Beware of the patient safety juggernauts;British Journal of Clinical Governance;2002-12-01