Abstract
‘Force protection’ is a primary concern of every military commander. Undoubtedly, it is an important and legitimate factor in the planning of every attack. However, when it comes to the humanitarian proportionality principle there is considerable controversy over the question to what extent ‘force protection’ can be factored into the humanitarian proportionality calculus as a relevant military advantage to be weighed against expected civilian casualties, injuries and damage. This question is pursued in this article.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference36 articles.
1. The Law of Armed Conflict after 9/11: Some Salient Features;Taft;Yale Journal of International Law,2003
2. The Law of Armed Conflict – A Contemporary Critique;Stephens;Melbourne Journal of International Law,2005
3. Customary International Humanitarian Law
4. Law and War in the Virtual Era;Beard;American Journal of International Law,2009
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献