Abstract
Since the first attempts by states to use law to regulate armed conflict, legal constraints have often failed to protect civilians from the adverse effects of war. Advances in military technology have usually not improved this situation and have instead made law even more distant and less relevant to the suffering of civilians in wartime. The massive, indiscriminate incendiary bombing campaigns against major urban areas in World War II spoke volumes about the irrelevance of fundamental legal principles and rules designed to protect civilian populations in wartime. Law and lawyers were in fact far removed, physically and operationally, from the cockpits of the United States bombers flying over Tokyo, whose aircrews were focused on surviving their missions. They struggled with limited information about their assigned targets and conducted their operations with rudimentary preflight instructions that directed them, for example, to avoid destroying the palace of the Japanese emperor but left them free to submerge entire residential areas of the city in a sea of flames.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference105 articles.
1. War’s New Science;Thomas;Newsweek,,Feb. 18, 1991
2. MQ-1 Predator Unmanned Aircraft System,Sept. 2008
3. Special Drones Pursue Militias;Miller;L.A. Times,,Sept. 12, 2008
4. Pakistani Fury over Airstrikes Imperils Training;Perlez;N.Y. Times,June 18, 2008
5. War Everywhere: Rights, National Security Law, and the Law of Armed Conflict in the Age of Terror
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献