Comparative Gender and Institutions: Directions for Research

Author:

Chappell Louise

Abstract

A comparative politics of gender offers an opportunity to consider in detail the operation of gender within political institutions. As such, it contributes to a deeper understanding of the roles and experiences of men and women within political institutions, of the policies, laws and norms that are the outcomes of these institutions, and of the relationship between these institutions and social actors. This essay proposes a multi-directional strategy for undertaking comparative gender and institutional research that includes taking account of similarities and differences within and across states, between states and international institutions, across space as well as across time. It argues that through this research strategy it is possible to gain a more nuanced understanding of gender processes and outcomes, which is valuable to those working both inside and outside political institutions to advance a women's equality agenda.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Political Science and International Relations

Reference44 articles.

1. The Structure of Intersectionality: A Comparative Politics of Gender;Weldon;Politics and Gender,2006

2. Rahmani Ladan . 2005. “International Human Rights Law: Gender Mainstreaming in the United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies.” Ph.D. diss., Economics, University of Sydney.

3. The New Institutional Politics

Cited by 43 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Intersectionality, Identity and Women’s Suffrage;Gender and Politics;2024

2. Climate just entrepreneurship: feminist entrepreneurship for climate action;International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship;2023-11-07

3. Diversity and Women’s Representation in Small States’ Diplomacy: A Case Study of Lithuania;The Hague Journal of Diplomacy;2023-07-05

4. The promise and limitations of Hong Kong's Women's Commission as a vehicle to drive gender equality;International Journal of Law in Context;2023-02-15

5. Building a New Model to Explain the Fertility Paradox;Women’s Employment and Childbearing in Post-Industrialized Societies;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3