Abstract
AbstractDrawing on a qualitative study of Hong Kong's Women's Commission (‘WoC’), this article examines how institutional mechanisms for the advancement of women function in a hybrid regime that includes both democratic and authoritarian elements. Hong Kong has a rights-based legal framework and equality agencies that support the operation of equality laws and policies. Paradoxically, Hong Kong's political system is non-democratic, and Beijing's Central People's Government is exerting more direct control on the territory. Grounded in qualitative interviews conducted with WoC members, non-governmental organisations, and scholars in Hong Kong, this article concludes that the WoC's full institutional potential in drawing attention to gender inequalities has not been realised. The implementation of authoritarian governance practices also has implications for the WoC's composition and agenda and may inhibit the development of progressive gender equality strategies to advance the status of women.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference87 articles.
1. Trickle‐down or Rising Tide? Lessons on Mainstreaming Gender Policy from Colombia and South Africa
2. The Human Rights of Women in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region;Kapai;William and Mary Journal of Women and the Law,2013
3. Contested spaces during transition: regime change in Myanmar and its implications for women;Barrow;Cardozo J. of Law and Gender,2015
4. Democracy, Rule of Law and Resisting the Creep of Authoritarianism
5. Women's Commission (2021) Women's Commission Report 2016–2019. Available at https://www.women.gov.hk/en/publications/report_2016.html (viewed 22 March 2021).