Changing long-term care provision at the local level in times of austerity – a qualitative study

Author:

GORI CRISTIANO

Abstract

ABSTRACTIn the first decade of the century, long-term care (LTC) policies for dependent older people in Italy were improved with respect to both the availability of public funds and the quality of services. At the turn of the decade, however, cost-containment and austerity measures were imposed as an overall priority for the public sector and this goal also affected the LTC sector. This article explores the effects produced by cost-containment policies, which widened the gap between care needs and available public funding, on the provision of LTC services at the local level in Italy during the economic crisis. The study is based on 34 semi-structured interviews with services managers employed in Italy's publicly funded LTC system. Data were analysed with the framework analysis method and six cross-cutting thematic categories were identified that depict, according to the interviewees, the main transformations that occurred in the provision of LTC at the local level as a consequence of cost-containment policies. ‘Uncertainty’ refers to the inability to predict what direction the LTC system is going to take in the foreseeable future. ‘Short-termism’ illustrates the pressure to focus excessively on day-to-day service delivery at the expense of a medium- to long-term view of their future. ‘Endangering quality’ describes the risk of not being able to maintain the level of quality of care achieved so far. ‘Allocative tensions’ refers to the tensions due to the increasing requirement to ration the provision of public LTC services. ‘Unequal re-familiarisation’ represents the very different impacts of the trend of re-familiarisation depending on families’ financial situation. ‘Inappropriate care’ depicts the rising number of older people receiving public care interventions that are not appropriate to meet their needs.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Geriatrics and Gerontology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Social Psychology,Health (social science)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3