Affiliation:
1. Instituto de Investigación en Políticas de Bienestar Social (POLIBIENESTAR)—Research Institute on Social Welfare Policy, Universidat de València
2. IRCCS-INRCA National Institute of Health & Science on Ageing, Centre for Socio-Economic Research on Ageing.
3. International Center for Family Studies (CISF)
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Long-term care (LTC), poverty, and socioeconomic deprivation are globally significant social issues. Ongoing population aging trends and the recent social and health emergencies caused by the COVID-19 pandemic crisis have highlighted the need for macro-level LTC and welfare system sustainability strategies. At the micro level, the relationship between LTC needs and the risk of socioeconomic deprivation and poverty should be taken into account to promote more targeted and innovative policies worldwide. This scoping review explores the relationship between LTC needs, the health status of older people, and the risk of socioeconomic deprivation for their families in order to understand how the literature interprets these concepts and the relationship between them and to identify any potential gaps in this regard.
Methods
The methodology considers different relevant sources: a) the guidelines for ScR proposed by Lockwood et al. [1]; b) the Munn et al. [2] recommendations; c) the PRISMA guideline for Scoping Reviews [3]; and d) the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist [4]; Sixty-three papers are included in the frequency analysis of 9 identified categories to respond of aims.
Results
The findings reveal the existence of a debate that seeks to understand the different characteristics of the relationship between the investigated issues. Specific targets (such as older people, caregivers, and households) are used to identify LTC needs, while material deprivation or poverty is used to determine the conditions of deprivation. Relevant gaps in the literature are identified in terms of the concepts and approaches of the studies analyzed. The results indicate that the reciprocal relationship between LTC needs, supply, and the risk of socioeconomic deprivation is understudied.
Conclusions
The simplification strategy used in many studies to reduce the relationship’s complexity precludes an in-depth analysis and debate on some relevant aspects, including the crucial two-way relationship between LTC needs/supply and the risk of socioeconomic deprivation. Future studies should focus on the causal relationship between the two phenomena and identify any internal factors that may be involved.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference61 articles.
1. Lockwood C, Dos Santos KB, Pap R. Practical guidance for knowledge synthesis: Scoping review methods. Asian Nursing Research. 2019 Dec 1;13(5):287 – 94.
2. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach;Munn Z;BMC Med Res Methodol,2018
3. [et al.]. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews;Page MJ;Syst Rev,2021
4. JBI GLOBAL WIKI. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis | Appendix 2.3: JBI Qualitative data extraction tool. (https://wiki.jbi.global/display/MANUAL/Appendix+2.3%3A+JBI+Qualitative+data+extraction+tool (accessed on 04 June 2021).
5. The definition and measurement of poverty;Hagenaars A;Journal of human resources,2018
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献