MORITA EQUIVALENCE-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

MORITA EQUIVALENCE

Published:2016-07-29 Issue:3 Volume:9 Page:556-582
ISSN:1755-0203
Container-title:The Review of Symbolic Logic
language:en
Short-container-title:The Review of Symbolic Logic

Author:

BARRETT THOMAS WILLIAM,HALVORSON HANS

Abstract

AbstractLogicians and philosophers of science have proposed various formal criteria for theoretical equivalence. In this paper, we examine two such proposals: definitional equivalence and categorical equivalence. In order to show precisely how these two well-known criteria are related to one another, we investigate an intermediate criterion called Morita equivalence.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Logic,Philosophy,Mathematics (miscellaneous)

Reference55 articles.

1. What Scientific Theories Could Not Be

2. On empirically equivalent systems of the world

3. Classical Mechanics Is Lagrangian; It Is Not Hamiltonian

4. One or Two Gentle Remarks about Hans Halvorson’s Critique of the Semantic View

Cited by 57 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. BEYOND LINGUISTIC INTERPRETATION IN THEORY COMPARISON;The Review of Symbolic Logic;2023-12-21

2. The nature of the physical and the meaning of physicalism;THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science;2023-10-26

3. Respecting boundaries: theoretical equivalence and structure beyond dynamics;European Journal for Philosophy of Science;2023-09-30

4. TESTING DEFINITIONAL EQUIVALENCE OF THEORIES VIA AUTOMORPHISM GROUPS;The Review of Symbolic Logic;2023-07-17

5. VI—On Type Distinctions and Expressivity;Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society;2023-07-01