VI—On Type Distinctions and Expressivity

Author:

Florio Salvatore12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Philosophy University of Birmingham Edgbaston Birmingham B15 2TT UK

2. University of Oslo Postboks 1020 Blindern 0315, Oslo NORWAY

Abstract

AbstractQuine maintained that philosophical and scientific theorizing should be conducted in an untyped language, which has just one style of variables and quantifiers. By contrast, typed languages, such as those advocated by Frege and Russell, include multiple styles of variables and matching kinds of quantification. Which form should our theories take? In this article, I argue that expressivity does not favour typed languages over untyped ones.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Philosophy

Reference50 articles.

1. ‘A Case for Higher-Order Metaphysics’.;Bacon

2. ‘Morita Equivalence’;Barrett;Review of Symbolic Logic,2016

3. ‘Quine’s Conjecture on Many-Sorted Logic’;Synthese,2017

4. ‘To Be Is to Be a Value of a Variable (or to Be Some Values of Some Variables)’;Boolos;Journal of Philosophy,1984

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3