The makers get it all? The coalitional welfare politics of Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. The case studies of Austria and Italy

Author:

Fischer TorbenORCID,Giuliani Giovanni AmerigoORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe article investigates whether and to what extent the welfare policies of Populist Radical Right Parties (PRRPs) vary in diverse government coalitions. Relying on a multidimensional framework differentiating coalitional politics along the welfare size and deservingness dimension, we conduct a comparative case study analysing welfare reforms of the ‘standard’ centre-right/PRRP government coalition ÖVP-FPÖ in Austria and the ‘new’ populist government coalition M5S-Lega in Italy. We find that both PRRPs do not promote pro-welfare policies in general, but rather opt for selective expansion of benefits for ‘makers’, while aiming at retrenching benefits for ‘takers’. This welfare strategy includes pensioners and male breadwinner families but excludes migrants or long-term unemployed. The analysis furthermore shows that the central line of conflict with the centre-right ÖVP is mostly about the size of welfare policies, especially for ‘deserving’ citizens, while with the socially more left-leaning M5S it is rather centred around the deservingness dimension, e.g., benefits for takers. These results offer a more fine-grained understanding of the PRRPs’ welfare agenda and their coalitional welfare politics in office.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science

Reference42 articles.

1. Congruent with whom? Parties’ issue emphases and voter preferences in welfare politics;Pinggera;Journal of European Public Policy,2020

2. Oswald, G. (2018), ‘ÖVP und FPÖ einig bei Mindestsicherung – Vermögenszugriff bleibt’, Der Standard, Retrieved from https://www.derstandard.at/story/2000092405061/oevp-und-fpoe-einigten-sich-auf-einheitliche-mindestsicherung

3. Salvini’s success and the collapse of the Five-star Movement: The European elections of 2019

4. Where do radical right parties stand? Position blurring in multidimensional competition

5. The FPÖ’s welfare chauvinism;Ennser-Jedenastik;Austrian Journal of Political Science,2020

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Re-evaluating the welfare preferences of radical-right voters: evidence from a vignette experiment;West European Politics;2024-06-12

2. References;The Mainstream Right and Family Policy Agendas in the Post-Fordist Age;2024-06-03

3. Does the Framing of Immigration Induce Welfare Chauvinism? The Effects of Negativity Bias and Motivated Reasoning;Political Behavior;2024-01-31

4. Towards a Post-crisis Welfare State in Central and Southeast Europe: Challenges and Perspectives;Social Work and Social Policy Transformations in Central and Southeast Europe;2024

5. Perceptions of populist radical right mainstreaming as a threat to democracy: evidence from Italian voters;South European Society and Politics;2023-10-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3