Abstract
AbstractObjective:To understand price incentives to upsize combination meals at fast-food restaurants by comparing the calories (i.e. kilocalories; 1 kcal = 4·184 kJ) per dollar of default combination meals (as advertised on the menu) with a higher-calorie version (created using realistic consumer additions and portion-size changes).Design:Combination meals (lunch/dinner:n258, breakfast:n68, children’s:n34) and their prices were identified from online menus; corresponding nutrition information for each menu item was obtained from a restaurant nutrition database (MenuStat). Linear models were used to examine the difference in total calories per dollar between default and higher-calorie combination meals, overall and by restaurant.Setting:Ten large fast-food chain restaurants located in the fifteen most populous US cities in 2017–2018.Participants:None.Results:There were significantly more calories per dollar in higher-caloriev.default combination meals for lunch/dinner (default: 577 kJ (138 kcal)/dollar, higher-calorie: 707 kJ (169 kcal)/dollar, difference: 130 kJ (31 kcal)/dollar,P< 0·001) and breakfast (default: 536 kJ (128 kcal)/dollar, higher-calorie: 607 kJ (145 kcal)/dollar, difference: 71 kJ (17 kcal)/dollar,P= 0·009). Results for children’s meals were in the same direction but were not statistically significant (default: 536 kJ (128 kcal)/dollar, higher-calorie: 741 kJ (177 kcal)/dollar, difference: 205 kJ (49 kcal)/dollar,P= 0·053). Across restaurants, the percentage change in calories per dollar for higher-caloriev. default combination meals ranged from 0·1 % (Dunkin’ Donuts) to 55·0 % (Subway).Conclusions:Higher-calorie combination meals in fast-food restaurants offer significantly more calories per dollar compared with default combination meals, suggesting there is a strong financial incentive for consumers to ‘upsize’ their orders. Future research should test price incentives for lower-calorie options to promote healthier restaurant choices.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference38 articles.
1. 37. US Food and Drug Administration (2018) Questions and Answers on the Menu and Vending Machines Nutrition Labeling Requirements. https://www.fda.gov/food/food-labeling-nutrition/questions-and-answers-menu-and-vending-machines-nutrition-labeling-requirements (accessed November 2018).
2. 35. Voices for Healthy Kids (2019) Breaking News: Progress for NYC Kids’ Meals. https://voicesforhealthykids.org/breaking-news-progress-nyc-kids-meals/ (accessed January 2019).
3. Asymmetric Paternalism to Improve Health Behaviors
4. Value for money or making the healthy choice: the impact of proportional pricing on consumers’ portion size choices
5. Effectiveness of Pricing Strategies on French Fries and Fruit Purchases among University Students: Results from an On-Campus Restaurant Experiment
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献