Understanding price incentives to upsize combination meals at large US fast-food restaurants

Author:

Vercammen Kelsey AORCID,Frelier Johannah M,Moran Alyssa J,Dunn Caroline G,Musicus Aviva A,Wolfson Julia,Ullah Omar S,Bleich Sara N

Abstract

AbstractObjective:To understand price incentives to upsize combination meals at fast-food restaurants by comparing the calories (i.e. kilocalories; 1 kcal = 4·184 kJ) per dollar of default combination meals (as advertised on the menu) with a higher-calorie version (created using realistic consumer additions and portion-size changes).Design:Combination meals (lunch/dinner:n258, breakfast:n68, children’s:n34) and their prices were identified from online menus; corresponding nutrition information for each menu item was obtained from a restaurant nutrition database (MenuStat). Linear models were used to examine the difference in total calories per dollar between default and higher-calorie combination meals, overall and by restaurant.Setting:Ten large fast-food chain restaurants located in the fifteen most populous US cities in 2017–2018.Participants:None.Results:There were significantly more calories per dollar in higher-caloriev.default combination meals for lunch/dinner (default: 577 kJ (138 kcal)/dollar, higher-calorie: 707 kJ (169 kcal)/dollar, difference: 130 kJ (31 kcal)/dollar,P< 0·001) and breakfast (default: 536 kJ (128 kcal)/dollar, higher-calorie: 607 kJ (145 kcal)/dollar, difference: 71 kJ (17 kcal)/dollar,P= 0·009). Results for children’s meals were in the same direction but were not statistically significant (default: 536 kJ (128 kcal)/dollar, higher-calorie: 741 kJ (177 kcal)/dollar, difference: 205 kJ (49 kcal)/dollar,P= 0·053). Across restaurants, the percentage change in calories per dollar for higher-caloriev. default combination meals ranged from 0·1 % (Dunkin’ Donuts) to 55·0 % (Subway).Conclusions:Higher-calorie combination meals in fast-food restaurants offer significantly more calories per dollar compared with default combination meals, suggesting there is a strong financial incentive for consumers to ‘upsize’ their orders. Future research should test price incentives for lower-calorie options to promote healthier restaurant choices.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference38 articles.

1. 37. US Food and Drug Administration (2018) Questions and Answers on the Menu and Vending Machines Nutrition Labeling Requirements. https://www.fda.gov/food/food-labeling-nutrition/questions-and-answers-menu-and-vending-machines-nutrition-labeling-requirements (accessed November 2018).

2. 35. Voices for Healthy Kids (2019) Breaking News: Progress for NYC Kids’ Meals. https://voicesforhealthykids.org/breaking-news-progress-nyc-kids-meals/ (accessed January 2019).

3. Asymmetric Paternalism to Improve Health Behaviors

4. Value for money or making the healthy choice: the impact of proportional pricing on consumers’ portion size choices

5. Effectiveness of Pricing Strategies on French Fries and Fruit Purchases among University Students: Results from an On-Campus Restaurant Experiment

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3