Abstract
In a famous passage from the Philosophical Investigations, Wittgenstein describes a pupil who has been learning to write out various sequences of numbers in response to orders such as “+1” (for the natural numbers) and “+2” (for the series 0, 2, 4, 6, 8…). He has shown himself competent for numbers up to 1000, but when we have him continue the “+2” sequence beyond 1000, he writes the numerals 1004, 1008, 1012. As Wittgenstein describes the case: We say to him, “Look what you’re doing!” — He doesn’t understand us. We say “You should have added two; look how you began the series!” — He answers: “Yes! Isn’t it right? I thought that’s how I should [sollen] do it. — Or suppose he were to say, pointing to the series, “But I went on in the same way!”(PI §185)1The passage continues:— It would now be no use to us to say “But don’t you see…?” — and repeat for him the old explanations and examples. — In such a case, we might perhaps say: this person naturally understands our order, once given our explanations, as we would understand the order “Add 2 up to 1000, 4 up to 2000, 6 up to 3000, and so on.”(ibid.)
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. A Non-Reductionist Response to Kripke’s Wittgenstein’s Sceptical Argument;Wittgenstein and the Possibility of Meaning;2024-08-15
2. Kripke’s Wittgenstein’s Sceptical Argument;Wittgenstein and the Possibility of Meaning;2024-08-15
3. Epilogue;Wittgenstein and the Possibility of Meaning;2024-08-15
4. Blind Rule-Following, Properly Construed;Wittgenstein and the Possibility of Meaning;2024-08-15
5. Boghossian and Wright on Blind Rule-Following;Wittgenstein and the Possibility of Meaning;2024-08-15