Author:
Aldashev Gani,Mastrobuoni Giovanni
Abstract
In close elections, a sufficiently high share of invalid ballots—if driven by voter mistakes or electoral fraud—can jeopardize the electoral outcome. We study how the closeness of electoral race relates to the share of invalid ballots, under the traditional paper-ballot hand-counted voting technology. Using a large micro-level data set from the Italian parliamentary elections in 1994–2001, we find a strong robust negative relationship between the margin of victory of the leading candidate over the nearest rival and the share of invalid ballots. We argue that this relationship is not driven by voter mistakes, protest, or electoral fraud. The explanation that garners most support is that of rational allocation of effort by election officers and party representatives, with higher rates ofdetectionof invalid ballots in close elections.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference28 articles.
1. Who Misvotes? The Effect of Differential Cognition Costs on Election Outcomes;Shue;American Economic Journal: Economic Policy,2009
2. Ethical Voters and Costly Information Acquisition
3. The Butterfly Did It: The Aberrant Vote for Buchanan in Palm Beach County, Florida;Wand;American Political Science Review,2001
4. Incompetence, Alienation, or Calculation?
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献