Abstract
How do marginal voters differ from regular voters? This article develops a method for comparing the partisan preferences of regular voters to those marginal voters whose turnout decisions are influenced by exogenous factors and applies it to two sources of variation in turnout in the United States—weather and election timing. In both cases, marginal voters are over 20 percentage points more supportive of the Democratic Party than regular voters—a significant divide. The findings suggest that the expansion or contraction of the electorate can have important consequences. Moreover, the findings suggest that election results do not always reflect the preferences of the citizenry, because the marginal citizens who may stay home have systematically different preferences than those who participate. Finally, the methods developed in the article may enable future researchers to compare regular and marginal voters on many different dimensions and in many different electoral settings.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference40 articles.
1. Sled Sarah . 2008. It’s In the Mail: The Effect of Vote By Mail Balloting on Voter Turnout and Policy Outcomes in U.S. Elections. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
2. Turnout and the Democratic Vote
3. Differential turnout and party advantage in British general elections, 1964–83
4. Compulsory voting, party stability and electoral advantage in Australia
Cited by
59 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献