Abstract
Across the academy, there is growing concern over diversity within academic institutions. According to recent research published in three top political science journals, members of historically marginalized groups remain underrepresented and marginalized in submissions, publications, and even reviewer pools (Ayoub 2022; Bell et al. 2020; Reinhardt, Windsor, and King 2022). Expectations that scholars, especially early career researchers (ECRs), “publish or perish” thus exacerbate intersectional inequalities within the discipline (Briscoe-Palmer and Mattocks 2021; McKenzie 2017; Steinþórsdóttir et al. 2018). Further, the overwhelming pressure to publish at all costs can commodify knowledge production and foster a toxic, competitive environment based on peer rivalry rather than collaboration for the sake of advancing knowledge (Horta and Li 2023, 269–70, 271–72).
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Gender Studies,Sociology and Political Science,Gender Studies
Reference16 articles.
1. Not that niche: making room for the study of LGBTIQ people in political science
2. Introduction: Diversity and Inclusion in Political Science as a Profession;Reinhardt;PS: Political Science and Politics,2022
3. New managerialism in the academy: Gender bias and precarity
4. Publishing Pedagogies for the Doctorate and Beyond
5. Grote, Lidiya , Reynolds, Latisha , and Howard, Alexandra . 2022. “Transforming the Publishing Academy.” Presented at the Transforming Libraries for Graduate Students Conference, East Tennessee State University, March 17. https://ir.library.louisville.edu/faculty/795/ (accessed April 5, 2023).
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献