Abstract
AbstractTotal testamentary freedom in English law came to an end with the passage of the Inheritance (Family Provision) Act 1938, since replaced by the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. The Act introduced the family provision rule, which allows disinherited family members to apply to court for a financial award out of the estate. This paper critically re-examines the parliamentary proceedings, held between 1928 and 1938, which debated the merits of testamentary freedom and the need to limit the doctrine by introducing the family provision rule, then already in force in many of the Dominions. There were strong social arguments in favour of redressing unjust disinheritances, pitted against core values of personal freedom and private ownership. The paper will show that there were compelling merits in introducing the family provision rule and the Act has stood the test of time.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference30 articles.
1. Brief history of English testamentary jurisdiction;Atkinson;Missouri Law Review,1943
2. The myth of testamentary freedom;Leslie;Arizona Law Review,1996
3. Caregiving and the case for testamentary freedom;Tate;UC Davis Law Review,2008
4. Testamentary freedom – myth or reality?;Brook;Conveyancer and Property Lawyer,2018
5. English Inheritance Law and Its Transfer to the Colonies
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献