Abstract
Abstract
The Estonian indefinite pronouns keegi ‘someone’ and miski ‘something’ are distinguished by being able to refer to animate or inanimate entities, respectively. However, in certain Estonian dialects, keegi is used to refer to inanimate entities as well. The aim of this paper is to describe the functions and use of keegi based on the data in the Corpus of Estonian Dialects. We used statistical analyses to determine which dialects typically use keegi to refer to inanimate entities and which variables (polarity, function, position in the clause, case marking) contribute most to this variation. The results show that there are significant differences between the dialects: keegi is mostly used to refer to inanimate entities in the northern dialects (most frequently in the Western, Mid, and Eastern dialects), but this phenomenon is rare or non-existent in the southern dialects. All of the variables studied contribute to this variation: keegi is most likely to refer to an inanimate being when it is in the partitive case, functions as an object, a partitive subject, or a negative polarity item, and is positioned at the end of a negative clause.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference86 articles.
1. Erelt, Mati & Metslang, Helle (eds.) 2017. Eesti keele süntaks [Syntax of the Estonian language] (Eesti Keele Varamu [Estonian language archive] III). Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus [University of Tartu Press].
2. A non-endoclitic in Estonian
3. Differential Subject Marking
4. Pajusalu, Renate . 2017b. Lause kommunikatiivne struktuur ja süntaktilised protsessid. Viiteseosed [Communicative sentence structure and syntactic processes: Reference links]. In Mati Erelt & Helle Metslang (eds.), 566–589.
5. Suomalaisten esihistorian kysymyksiä [Questions of Finnish prehistory];Sammallahti;Virittäjä,1977
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献