Abstract
In a recent NJL article (Enger 2013), Hans-Olav Enger argues against some analyses of gender and ‘pancake sentences’, in particular against Josefsson (2009). In this short contribution, I will discuss what I take to be misunderstandings in Enger (2013). In addition I will discuss some data not included in Enger's (2013) analysis, which I will show to be crucial for the comparison between the different analyses proposed.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference39 articles.
1. Scandinavian pancake sentences as semantic agreement
2. Disagreeing doubling det;Josefsson;Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax,2012
3. Pancake sentences and the semanticization of formal gender in Mainland Scandinavian
4. On non-copula Tough constructions in Swedish;Klingvall;Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax,2011
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献