Author:
Broderick Pia,Walker Iain
Abstract
Many treatments for infertility require the use of donated gametes or embryos. Arguments have been made that all parties involved (donors, recipients, and children) should have open access to information about one another. The present article reports a survey of attitudes of 77 donors and 327 recipients in the state of Western Australia. Donors and recipients endorsed a register of nonidentifying information, but were less keen on a register of identifying information. They believed that medical personnel should have access to such registers, and that donors and recipients (but not children) should have access to nonidentifying, but not identifying, information. Typically, the sort of information respondents wanted to access pertained to health status and physical characteristics. Overwhelmingly, both donors and recipients saw gamete and embryo donation as more like blood donation than like adoption.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Public Administration,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Sociology and Political Science
Reference64 articles.
1. The psychology of assisted reproduction — or psychology assisting its reproduction?
2. A Call For Openness in Donor Insemination
3. “Psychosocial Aspects of Donor Insemination; Sperm Donors: Their Motivations and Attitudes to Artificial Insemination.”;Pedersen;Acta Obstetrics Gynecology of Scandinavia,1994
4. “The Effects of Gender-Specific Diagnosis on Men's and Women's Response to Infertility.”;Nachtigall;Fertility and Sterility,1992
5. Doubts and Realities in DI Family Relationships
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献