Author:
Stiell Ian G.,Wells George A.,McKnight R. Douglas,Brison Robert,Lesiuk Howard,Clement Catherine M.,Eisenhauer Mary A.,Greenberg Gary H.,MacPhail Iain,Reardon Mark,Worthington James,Verbeek Richard,Dreyer Jonathan,Cass Daniel,Schull Michael,Morrison Laurie,Rowe Brian,Holroyd Brian,Bandiera Glen,Laupacis Andreas,
Abstract
ABSTRACTThis paper is Part I of a 2-part series to describe the background and methodology for the Canadian C-Spine Rule study to develop a clinical decision rule for rational imaging in alert and stable trauma patients. Current use of radiography is inefficient and variable, in part because there has been a lack of evidence-based guidelines to assist emergency physicians. Clinical decision rules are research-based decision-making tools that incorporate 3 or more variables from the history, physical examination or simple tests. The Canadian CT Head and C-Spine (CCC) Study is a large collaborative effort to develop clinical decision rules for the use of CT head in minor head injury and for the use of cervical spine radiography in alert and stable trauma victims. Part I details the background and rationale for the development of the Canadian C-Spine Rule. Part II will describe in detail the objectives and methods of the Canadian C-Spine Rule study.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Cited by
38 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献