Author:
WOLKENSTEIN ANDREAS,JOX RALF J.,FRIEDRICH ORSOLYA
Abstract
Abstract:Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) are driven essentially by algorithms; however, the ethical role of such algorithms has so far been neglected in the ethical assessment of BCIs. The goal of this article is therefore twofold: First, it aims to offer insights into whether (and how) the problems related to the ethics of BCIs (e.g., responsibility) can be better grasped with the help of already existing work on the ethics of algorithms. As a second goal, the article explores what kinds of solutions are available in that body of scholarship, and how these solutions relate to some of the ethical questions around BCIs. In short, the article asks what lessons can be learned about the ethics of BCIs from looking at the ethics of algorithms. To achieve these goals, the article proceeds as follows. First, a brief introduction into the algorithmic background of BCIs is given. Second, the debate about epistemic concerns and the ethics of algorithms is sketched. Finally, this debate is transferred to the ethics of BCIs.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science)
Reference31 articles.
1. Algorithmic decision-making based on machine learning from Big Data: Can transparency restore accountability?;de Laat;Philosophy and Technology,2017
2. Brain–machine interfaces and personal responsibility for action – maybe not as complicated after all;Holm;Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology,2010
3. Ethical aspects of brain computer interfaces: a scoping review
4. Managing for Political Corporate Social Responsibility: New Challenges and Directions for PCSR 2.0
5. Accountable algorithms;Kroll;University of Pennsylvania Law Review,2017
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献