Abstract
AbstractFrom epileptic seizures to depressive symptoms, predictive neurotechnologies are used for a large range of applications. In this article we focus on advisory devices; namely, predictive neurotechnology programmed to detect specific neural events (e.g., epileptic seizure) and advise users to take necessary steps to reduce or avoid the impact of the forecasted neuroevent. Receiving advise from a predictive device is not without ethical concerns. The problem with predictive neural devices, in particular advisory ones, is the risk of seeing one’s autonomous choice supplanted by the predictions instead of being supplemented by it. For users, there is a potential shift from being assisted by the system to being over-dependent on the technology. In other terms, it introduces ethical issues associated with epistemic dependency. In this article, we examine the notion of epistemic authority in relation to predictive neurotechnologies. Section 1 of our article explores and defines the concept of epistemic authority. In section 2, we illustrate how predictive devices are best conceived of as epistemic authorities and we explore the subject-device epistemic relationship. In section 3, we spell out the risk of harms interconnected with epistemic deferral. We conclude by stressing a set of preliminary measures to prepare users for the authoritative nature of predictive devices.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Health Policy,Neurology,Philosophy
Reference30 articles.
1. Haeusermann, T., C.R. Lechner, K.C. Fong, A. Bernstein Sideman, A. Jaworska, W. Chiong, et al. 2021. Closed-Loop Neuromodulation and Self-Perception in Clinical Treatment of Refractory Epilepsy. AJOB Neuroscience 2: 1–13.
2. Gilbert, F. 2015. A Threat to Autonomy? The Intrusion of Predictive Brain Implants. AJOB Neuroscience 6 (4): 4–11.
3. Miletic, T., and F. Gilbert. 2020. Does AI Brain Implant Compromise Agency? Examining Potential Harms of Brain-Computer Interfaces on Self-Determination. Ed Gouveia S.S., In: Artificial Intelligence and Information: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Vernon Press. Pages 253-272. ISBN: 978-1-62273-872-4
4. Gilbert, F., M. Cook, T. O’Brien, and J. Illes. 2018. Embodiment and Estrangement: Results from a First-in-Human “Intelligent BCI” Trial. Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (1): 83–96.
5. Gilbert, F., T. O’Brien, and M. Cook. 2018. The Effects of Closed-Loop Brain Implants on Autonomy and Deliberation: What are the Risks of Being Kept in the Loop? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics: CQ: The International Journal of Healthcare Ethics Committees 27 (2): 316–325.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献