Author:
Liu Hong,Pach Péter Pál,Palincza Richárd
Abstract
AbstractA set of integers is primitive if it does not contain an element dividing another. Let f(n) denote the number of maximum-size primitive subsets of {1,…,2n}. We prove that the limit α = limn→∞f(n)1/n exists. Furthermore, we present an algorithm approximating α with (1 + ε) multiplicative error in N(ε) steps, showing in particular that α ≈ 1.318. Our algorithm can be adapted to estimate the number of all primitive sets in {1,…,n} as well.We address another related problem of Cameron and Erdős. They showed that the number of sets containing pairwise coprime integers in {1,…n} is between ${2^{\pi (n)}} \cdot {e^{(1/2 + o(1))\sqrt n }}$ and ${2^{\pi (n)}} \cdot {e^{(2 + o(1))\sqrt n }}$. We show that neither of these bounds is tight: there are in fact ${2^{\pi (n)}} \cdot {e^{(1 + o(1))\sqrt n }}$ such sets.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Computational Theory and Mathematics,Statistics and Probability,Theoretical Computer Science
Reference10 articles.
1. On the Number of Sets of Integers With Various Properties
2. [7] OEIS (1999) A051026: Number of primitive subsequences of {1,2,…,n}. The On-line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences. https://oeis.org/A051026
3. [5] Bishnoi, A. (2017) On a famous pigeonhole problem. Anurag’s Math Blog. https://anuragbishnoi.wordpress.com/2017/11/02/on-a-famous-pigeonhole-problem
4. THE TYPICAL STRUCTURE OF MAXIMAL TRIANGLE-FREE GRAPHS
5. Sharp bound on the number of maximal sum-free subsets of integers