Abstract
AbstractLittle extended attention has been given to Kant’s notion of self-conceit (Eigendünkel), though it appears throughout his theoretical and practical philosophy. Authors who discuss self-conceit often describe it as a kind of imperiousness or arrogance in which the conceited agent seeks to impose selfish principles upon others, or sees others as worthless. I argue that these features of self-conceit are symptoms of a deeper and more thoroughgoing failure. Self-conceit is best described as the tendency to insist upon one’s own theoretical or practical conclusions at any cost, while still wanting to appear – to oneself or to others – as though one is abiding by the constraints of theoretical or practical reason. Self-conceit is thus less centrally the tendency to impose one’s will or inclinations upon others, and more centrally the tendency to reconstruct evidence and rationalize so that one may be convinced of one’s own virtue. While the conceited agent may ultimately impose her judgement upon others, she does so in order to preserve her delusion of virtue.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The “Third Thing”;Depth: A Kantian Account of Reason;2024-10-11
2. Shallow Morality in the Groundwork;Depth: A Kantian Account of Reason;2024-10-11
3. Depth and Moral Worth;Depth: A Kantian Account of Reason;2024-10-11
4. Practical Reason as the Source of Explanation and Comprehension;Depth: A Kantian Account of Reason;2024-10-11
5. Reason, Systematicity, Judgment, and Depth in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason;Depth: A Kantian Account of Reason;2024-10-11