Abstract
The ArgumentFocusing on the celebrations of Newton and his work, this article investigates the use of the concept of genius and its connection with debates on the methodology of science and the morality of great discoverers. During the period studied, two areas of tension developed. Firstly, eighteenth-century ideas about the relationship between genius and method were challenged by the notion of scientific genius as transcending specifiable rules of method. Secondly, assumptions about the nexus between intellectual and moral virtue were threatened by the emerging conception of genius as marked by an extraordinary personality – on the one hand capable of breaking with established methods to achieve great discoveries, on the other, likely to transgress moral and social conventions. The assesments of Newton by nineteenth-century scientists such as Brewster, Whewell, and De Morgan were informed by these tensions.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Social Sciences
Cited by
58 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. 5. Augustus De Morgan;Augustus De Morgan, Polymath;2024-09-04
2. John Herschel and Politics;The Cambridge Companion to John Herschel;2024-05-09
3. Herschel’s Philosophy of Science;The Cambridge Companion to John Herschel;2024-05-09
4. Scientific Method, Induction, and Probability: The Whewell–De Morgan Debate on Baconianism, 1830s–1850s;HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science;2024-03-01
5. Drives in Schelling: Drives as Cognitive Faculties;The Concept of Drive in Classical German Philosophy;2021-11-25